Meteorites From the Tunguska Event—Fodder for 15 Minutes of Fame?

Posted in Astronomy, Education, Ethics, Science, Technology, Uncategorized on May 10, 2013 by jaksichja

Mere mention of the Tunguska Event may trigger a distant memory from Carl Sagan’s Cosmos series that aired on PBS in the 1980s. Through the intrepid story-telling of Carl Sagan, the general public came to understand that our Solar System was their dynamic “backyard” to be explored, and treasured.

Presently, a publication at the Physics e-print server has acquired a fair amount of publicity; it has announced the discovery of artifacts from the Tunguska Event. Strangely enough, the artifacts are pieces of meteorite (discovered in 1988) that have surfaced in publication  25 years later. Sadly, the scholarly paper is short on statistical analysis. As someone who is trained as a chemist—I had wished to see “hard data.” The author gives a fair amount of qualitative description of meteorite pieces and goes to the extent of performing computational analysis on the energetics of impact.

At a certain point, I read the paper with much dismay—and “learned” that the meteorite artifacts came from a shoal of a riverbed near the impact area. The lack of scientific rigor is very sad to me.

As mentioned in the paper, the author is awaiting chemical analysis of the fragments.

As I try to recall the rigors of scientific analysis and publication—the chemical analysis of the fragments “needed” to have been done simultaneously. The pubic (and the scientific community) deserve a better reason to believe the supposition despite the author’s tardy publication (I am reminded of the 1988 discovery date).

Sadly enough, it seems to be a case of “putting the cart before the horse.”

See further below for more information:

Fig. 1 Map showing Tunguska River area with the World in perspective. Original Credit: Dr. Tony Phillips, NASA News (2008)

URL Source: http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2008/30jun_tunguska/

Fig. 2 via Wikipedia: Trees were knocked down and burned over hundreds of square km by the Tunguska meteoroid impact. This image is cropped from the original, taken in May 1929 during the Leonid Kulik expedition.

Source URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tunguska_event_fallen_trees.jpg

Fig. 3 Tunguska event (of 1908) took place in a remote region of Siberia—along the Stony Tunguska River (or Podkamennaya Tunguska River).

URL Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Yeniseirivermap.png

From the Wikipedia source: author, Kmusser using Digital Chart of the World.

The Podkamennaya Tunguska may be translated in the following manner: Stony Tunguska is a river in Siberian Russia. The name of the river comes from the fact that it flows under pebble fields without open water.

_

REFERENCES:

NASA News Tunguska Event (from 2008)

Tunguska Meteorites ? link to e-print server paper

 

New Directions–

Posted in Astrobiology, Astronomy, Education, Ethics, Philosophy, Science, Uncategorized on May 3, 2013 by jaksichja

Source:  NASA

Source: NASA

New directions and perspective.

 

Within the next 7 days, I will re-focus my attention upon the public’s perception of  astrobiology and astronomy. I have, for the most part, been interested in public outreach for the last several years. And, I am attempting to take my cue from the call from certain science communicators to make aspects of science readily understandable. (see reference at end of post)

I will still post technical articles (from time to time) but I feel that the lack of science literacy is based (in part) upon a reluctance of a “skittish” public to enjoy science which they feel is not relevant.

Because of the current sequester, I feel the time is ripe for many of us to address pubic outreach in a different manner–utilizing our personal resources and passion.

I am reminded of the herculean success with which the late Carl Sagan communicated a love for astronomy and the sciences–and there are those who successfully carry on with his mission. I am not attempting to duplicate, nor usurp their efforts. Rather, I hope to carve my own path.

I hope to not lose many of my current “followers,” but I hope you will find time to comment and remind me of its relevance.

See you in day or two–

Reference(s):

I am taking a cue (in part) from the following reference and their mission statement: (please note that  I use it only as reference)

http://www.centerforcommunicatingscience.org/our-mission-2/

I am not (in any way) connected with the SUNY-Stonybrook nor the Center for Communicating Science at SUNY-Stony Brook.

However, I personally recognize the urgency of “good science literacy.”

I am, also, taking my cue from many successful bloggers and writers (at Word Press). I am sorry if I have failed to mention your name as a source for my inspiration, but the list would be very, very long.

Dwarf Planet: Makemake—Shedding Light on a Distant Solar System Object

Posted in Astronomy, Education, Science, Technology, Uncategorized on May 2, 2013 by jaksichja

 

 

Fig. 1 Dwarf Planet Makemake—a Kuiper Belt Object (Source—NASA)

Source URL: http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/multimedia/display.cfm?Category=Planets&IM_ID=10804

Original Credit: Princeton University

 

The dwarf planet Makemake was discovered in 2005 by astronomers, M.E. Brown, C.A. Trujillo, and D.L. Rabinowitz utilizing the Palomar Observatory. It takes approximately 310 earth years for Makemake to orbit the Sun, and Makemake is a Kuiper Belt object. The Kuiper Belt is an area in the Solar System known for comets, dwarf planets and other small objects. Its size, shape and whether it possesses moons of its own are currently unclear—and is important in the further understanding of the Solar System’s origins.

The origin of the name Makemake comes from Rapu Nui mythology (of Easter Island)—and it is said that Brown, Trujillo, and Rabinowitz discovered the dwarf planet during the Easter season.

 

Fig. 2 Mythological Fertility God of the Rapnui Easter Island people—Makemake. (From the source: Petroglyph of Easter Islands Make Make god.)

Source URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Makemake.jpeg

 

From what is currently understood, the objects of the Solar System underwent a cataclysmic birth approximately 4.5 billion years ago—and what presently resides in the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud are the Solar System’s earliest remnants. Why are astronomers (and astrobiologists) interested in the earliest remnants? Some of the answers that are hoped to be gleaned from their investigations will go part way to answering a “chicken and egg” paradox. If the early remnants contain only “simple” life molecules—glycine, alanine, and the simplest precursors to nucleobases; then it may be inferred that life may have started on Earth. Or, without jargon—life formed on our planet without it arriving from a comet (or meteorite). Then science will (and can) attempt to further address the questions of our planet’s role for life’s conception. (So much so, that our planet’s role for life’s conception may be considered as a proto-womb—if one can excuse the human-like reference.)

Interestingly enough, Makemake seems to be the largest Kuiper Belt dwarf planet that does not have a moon/s. Furthermore, the majority of Kuiper Belt objects have lower albedo numbers due to purported collisions. (The number of Kuiper Belt objects is well over 1000—see the link below). For instance:

 

Short table of trans-Neptunian object (also considered to be dwarf planets)—the current “Absolute Magnitudes” are listed on the right.

    Eris     -1.1    

    Pluto     -0.8    

    Haumea     0.1    

    Makemake     0.1

    Sedna     1.5    

For a full-list of known trans-Neptunian objects (from the “source”—See the following) Professor Mike Brown–Cal Tech (Please handle with care!)

Chlorophyll: Comments on the Molecules of Life—Part III

Posted in Astrobiology, Astronomy, Biology, Chemistry, Education, Science, Technology, Uncategorized on April 27, 2013 by jaksichja

The first organisms on Earth may have closely mimicked the geochemistry of our planet. The reasons as to why may be worded in the following manner, the first organisms needed to be (1) simple, and (2) adapt to the immediate, geochemical energetics. Examining seawater and other saline-type environments allows one to ponder upon the early geochemistry. How and why did life manage to gain a strong foothold upon the Earth? That “mystery” seems like magic to many of us. Life’s chemistry follows an evolutionary path—it found “the Darwin’s warm pond.” (And, where was that original warm pond? It truly is unknown.) Given what is known—the fossilized remnants, the chemical life forms that abound in the hot, sea vents (the black/white smokers), and other hyper-saline environments on our planet, there is a chemical commonality. As any (earthly) organism would do—it adapted in a manner that assured its survival.

 

via Wikipedia--Living fossils of Shark Bay, Australia.

via Wikipedia–Living fossils of Shark Bay, Australia.

Fig. 1  Stromatolites of Shark Bay are typical of Microbial Mattes which covered the primordial Earth.  (See the following URL:

http://www.sharkbay.org/default.aspx?WebPageID=228 )

 

Stromatolites of primordial Earth were primarily made of Cyanobacteria–that utilized Chlorophyll.

 

Fig. 2 via Wikipedia. White Smokers, (“White flocculent mats in and around the extremely gassy, high-temperature (>100°C, 212°F) white smokers at Champagne Vent.”) Original is from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

From the source description: “White smokers emitting carbon dioxide at the Champagne vent, Northwest Eifuku volcano, Marianas Trench Marine National Monument”

Source URL : http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/04fire/logs/hirez/champagne_vent_hirez.jpg

The earliest life forms did not utilize photosynthesis of which we are familiar. The organisms had an abundance of hydrogen, methane, sulfur, nitrogen, phosphorous, and an assorted lot of metals to utilize for its foodstuffs. (The carbon, oxygen, along with the eventual migration from a reducing atmosphere to an oxygenated atmosphere may have occurred as the consequence of the ground beneath our feet.) Although the migration from simplistic (?) life without utilizing chlorophyll (bacterial or plant) to the more familiar life forms is not readily understood. Three of the more abundant elements in the Earth’s crust; silicon, magnesium and oxygen needed to elicit a disequilibrium in the early organisms of life. Earth’s early organisms needed to adapt to an outside prompt (to become oxygen producers). The early organisms also “needed” to have “chlorophyll-like” chemistry in place so the organisms could readily adapt to produce oxygen. Evolution dictates that life’s footsteps be logically consistent—there seem to be no quantum leaps

Although the bio-origins of chlorophyll remain mysterious, it may be intimated that once it took hold upon the Earth it evolved in the reducing atmosphere to the oxygenated atmosphere. The earliest forms of chlorophyll seem to be bacterial—not so surprisingly—and we continue to search for how chlorophyll (that complex molecule) took hold.

__

REFERENCES:

Primary Reference for post from the Journal –Astrobiology

Serrano, Paloma, Alves Forancelli, Michael Scott Chaffin, Jack Thomas O Malley-james, and Susan Carla Moreno. 2013. “From Cytoplasm to Environment : The Inorganic Ingredients for the Origin of Life” 13 (3): 294–303. doi:10.1089/ast.2012.0836.

Further Comments on Chirality . . . under a Cat’s Paw?

Posted in Astrobiology, Astronomy, Chemistry, Education, Science, Technology, Uncategorized on April 24, 2013 by jaksichja

Figure 1.

Source URL:

http://www.astrobio.net/index.php?option=com_galleryimg&task=imageofday&imageId=336&msg=&id=&pageNo=122

 

From the SOURCE:

 

<"Nebulae are perhaps as famous for being identified with familiar shapes as perhaps cats are for getting into trouble. Still, no known cat could have created the vast Cat's Paw Nebula visible in Scorpius. At 5,500 light years distant, Cat's Paw is an emission nebula with a red color that originates from an abundance of ionized hydrogen atoms. Alternatively known as the Bear Claw Nebula or NGC 6334, stars nearly ten times the mass of our Sun have been born there in only the past few million years. Pictured here, a wide angle, deep field image of the Cat's Paw nebula was culled from the second Digitized Sky Survey. Credit: ESO, DSS2 "

 

A fairly recent publication supported the notion of polarizing light (UV) as a possible candidate for the favorability of left-handed molecules:

The finding was published in Astrophysical Journal Letters March 1, 2013

Also from the source: ” research team with Jungmi Kwon (GUAS/NAOJ) has performed deep imaging linear and circular polarimetry of the ‘Cat’s Paw Nebula’ (NGC 6334), located in the constellation Scorpius, and detected high degrees of circular polarization (CP) — as much as 22% in NGC 6334. The detected CP degree is the highest ever observed.”

 

Earlier publications by Bailey et al and Norden demonstrated that amino acids may undergo conversion to the left-handed isomer.

 

Norden performed lab experiments where D and L (amino acids) isomers form at different rates–and the more stable (L-form) survives.

Norden (1977) Nature, 266:567

 

 

 

 

Bailey et al –seem to indicate that the most likely sources for converting the Amino Acids are –White Dwarf Stars that possess a high magnetic field.

Bailey (2001) Orig. Life Evol. Biosphere, 31:167 & Bailey et al (1998) Science, 281:672

 

These publications should be available behind a paywall.

 

 

Supernova of 2.2 million years ago left it’s traces upon the Earth (with link provided)

Posted in Astrobiology, Astronomy, Biology, Education, Science, Technology, Uncategorized on April 19, 2013 by jaksichja

I thought that the following news was an interesting item concerning Earth’s magnetotactic bacteria:

 

http://www.astrobio.net/pressrelease/5453/supernova-left-its-mark-in-ancient-bacteria

 

The significance of the radioactive marker can be utilized in “dating” and pinning-down other events in the Earth’s early bio-history!

An Intriguing Subtlety of Porphyrin Bio-Chemistry—Part II

Posted in Astrobiology, Biology, Chemistry, Education, Evolution, Science, Technology, Uncategorized on April 18, 2013 by jaksichja

The intriguing chemistry of porphyrins comes, in part, from the seemingly ease of synthesis with simple starting materials. Many University-level chemistry majors perform the lab work in their elementary sophomore/junior classes. The lab work is an adaptation of Paul Rothemund’s synthesis from 1935. A simplified (?) reaction scheme is illustrated in Fig. 1: (The beauty of the scheme is the “set-up” takes place in one reaction “vessel.” The major drawback is the low amount of desired product at the end of the lab.) The low “yield” at the other end (of the equation) seems to characterize a majority of attempts to emulate nature (?) in one reaction vessel. The reason for the statement is—try to imagine the length of time in which “life” itself seemed to utilize porphyrin-like structures—early bacteria utilizing chlorophyll or porphyrin-like structures. According to most estimates—it is in the ballpark of 500,000,000 years (1/2 of a billion years). The illustrated reaction takes approximately 30 minutes to complete—or one lab session.

Fig. 1 Source Wikipedia—One “pot” synthesis of a porphyrin

The attempts to understand (or bio-mimic) nature hinge upon certain aspects of classical chemistry (e.g. thermodynamics—the study of heat, temperature, energy and “randomness or dis-order.”) The important aspect of “randomness” is better termed—entropy. In a nutshell, entropy is a (major) controlling factor which might be stated: as time goes by . . . disorder increases. Entropy is a difficult concept (in part) because most of us think of the world as being readily determined—without complication. (Aside: entropy is just one reason why an internal combustion engine may get only 35 miles to a gallon of gasoline while it should, hypothetically, attain 45 miles to the gallon.)

The subtle bio-chemistry that utilizes porphyrins for respiration or sensory processes evolved a long, long time ago—it may not easily surrender the mechanistic detail of its origins. However, piecing the puzzle of our origins is a magnificent journey that appreciates with time.

__

References and Links:

Porphyrin lab synthesis

  • P. Rothemund (1935). “Formation of Porphyrins from Pyrrole and Aldehydes”. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
    57 (10): 2010–2011. doi:10.1021/ja01313a510.

     

Thermodynamics for all

  • P. W. Atkins (2010). The Laws of Thermodynamics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.

    (Available from Amazon or Barnes & Noble)

     

An Approach to Physical Law

  • R. Feynman (1964). The Character of Physical Law (The Messenger Lectures). MIT Press.

    (Available from Amazon or Barnes & Noble)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 41 other followers

%d bloggers like this: